linux-kernel - Re: [patch] add /proc/pid/stack to dump task's stack trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:38:04 -0800
From:	Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] add /proc/pid/stack to dump task's stack trace

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> oh well - Ken, could you please switch it to seqfiles?

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Or you can do all of this in ->show(), without start/next/stop:
>
>        for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
>                seq_printf(m, "[<%p>] %pS\n", x, x);

Here is a patch convert to seq_file using proc_single_show() helper.
I don't see it to be any superior than what was before using
snprintf().  seq_read also allocate one page for printf buffer, so
functionally it is the same (perhaps a little bit better because it
can use the whole page, compare to PROC_BLOCK_SIZE currently).  Ingo,
it's your call whether to merge this patch or not.

I also agree that using full blown seqfile start/show/stop won't add
value because most valuable stack at the top are already printed.


Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 805e514..6d294a4 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -351,11 +351,12 @@ static int proc_pid_wchan

 #define MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH	64

-static int proc_pid_stack(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
+static int proc_pid_stack(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
+			  struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	struct stack_trace trace;
 	unsigned long *entries;
-	int i, len = 0;
+	int i;

 	entries = kmalloc(sizeof(*entries)*MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!entries)
@@ -375,15 +376,12 @@ static int proc_pid_stack
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);

 	for (i = 0; i < trace.nr_entries; i++) {
-		len += snprintf(buffer + len, PROC_BLOCK_SIZE - len,
-				"[<%p>] %pS\n",
-				(void *)entries[i], (void *)entries[i]);
-		if (!len)
-			break;
+		seq_printf(m, "[<%p>] %pS\n",
+			   (void *)entries[i], (void *)entries[i]);
 	}
 	kfree(entries);

-	return len;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif

@@ -2537,7 +2535,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[]
 	INF("wchan",      S_IRUGO, pid_wchan),
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
-	INF("stack",      S_IRUSR, pid_stack),
+	ONE("stack",      S_IRUSR, pid_stack),
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
 	INF("schedstat",  S_IRUGO, pid_schedstat),
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/