linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_32 has its own irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:42:01 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_32 has its own irq_regs definition


* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:

> Impact: prevent second percpu define of unused irq_regs
> 
> Arches that have their own irq_regs definition are expected to
> define ARCH_HAS_OWN_IRQ_REGS or else a generic (unused) set
> will also be defined in lib/irq_regs.c
> 
> Sparse noticed the unused generic one had no prototype:
> lib/irq_regs.c:15:1: warning: symbol 'per_cpu____irq_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs_32.h |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

applied to tip/x86/cleanups, thanks Harvey!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/