| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:46:17 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on BROKEN * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> > Subject: x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on BROKEN > > While investigating the failure of hibernation on 32-bit x86 with > CONFIG_NUMA set, as described in this message > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122634118116226&w=4 I asked some > people for help and I was told that it wasn't really worth the > effort, because CONFIG_NUMA was generally broken on 32-bit x86 > systems and it shouldn't be used in such configs. For this reason, > make CONFIG_NUMA depend on BROKEN instead of EXPERIMENTAL on x86-32. Actually, it works just fine on a wide range of 32-bit systems that i have, so NAK. Hibernation might not work but that's i believe a NUMA<->HIBERNATION interaction issue, we need to fix that. Regular system bootup and stress-tests work just fine. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists