linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: try to catch missing VMLINUX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:02:50 +0000
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: try to catch missing VMLINUX_SYMBOL() in
	vmlinux.lds.h

On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 05:56:05PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Seems like every other release we have someone who updates vmlinux.lds.h and
> adds C-visible symbols without VMLINUX_SYMBOL() around them.  So start
> checking the file and only allow assignments that use one of the following
> symbols on a side:
> 	.
> 	ALIGN(...)
> 	VMLINUX_SYMBOL(...)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl |   13 +++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index f88bb3e..8e96b42 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2189,6 +2189,19 @@ sub process {
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> +# make sure symbols are always wrapped with VMLINUX_SYMBOL() ...
> +# all assignments may have only one of the following with an assignment:
> +#	.
> +#	ALIGN(...)
> +#	VMLINUX_SYMBOL(...)
> +		if ($realfile =~ /vmlinux.lds.h$/) {
> +			if ($line =~ /=/ &&
> +			    !($line =~ /([.]|(ALIGN|VMLINUX_SYMBOL)[(][^=]*[)])\s*=\s*([.]|(ALIGN|VMLINUX_SYMBOL)[(][^=]*[)])/))
> +			{
> +				WARN("vmlinux.lds.h needs VMLINUX_SYMBOL() around C-visible symbols\n" . $herecurr);
> +			}
> +		}
> +
>  # check for redundant bracing round if etc
>  		if ($line =~ /(^.*)\bif\b/ && $1 !~ /else\s*$/) {
>  			my ($level, $endln, @chunks) =
> -- 

Ok, that seems like a sane check.  I think what we are really wanting
to check for is assigments with plain identifiers on either side?  I've
pushed a softened version of this check to my tree for testing.

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/