linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] New IDE/block driver for OCTEON SOC Compact Flash interface.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:04:31 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New IDE/block driver for OCTEON SOC Compact Flash interface.

Hello.

Alan Cox wrote:

>> OTOH, CF support via self-contained driver is certainly a waste of code 
>> since IDE core and (libata) are here to drive the CF devices as well. 
>> What we need is a "normal" IDE or libata (at your option) driver.
>>     
>
> A libata driver would be nice and probably easiest to do as you don't
> have to pretend to be close to old style taskfile IDE for a PC.
>   

   AFAIU you don't need to pretend that with IDE as well now.

> I am not convinced there is no case for a 'dumb' small CF driver, but if
> so the chipset code and the core code need to be separated as the other
> requests I see for this are different embedded boxes wanting to keep
> codesize down.
>   

  Yeah, that might be worth considering...

> Alan
>   

WBR, Sergei


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/