linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: introduce simple_malloc()/simple

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:23:31 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	arjan@...radead.org
Cc:	laijs@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, menage@...gle.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, jack@...e.cz, jes@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: introduce simple_malloc()/simple_free()

From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:53:09 -0800

> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:35:03 +0800
> Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > vmalloc() is not good for performance and increasing fragment.
> > but vmalloc() is need for some subsystems' alternative malloc,
> > like cgroup's tasks file and other subsystems(about 20 subsystems).
> 
> actually what you are pointing out is that these areas need improvement
> to not need such huge blocks of memory... but only a series of smaller
> blocks instead.

Like the IPSEC policy and state hash tables when hundreds of thousands
of rules become active?

You have to be joking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/