linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched: add locking when update the task_group's cfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:53:19 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: add locking when update the task_group's
	cfs_rq[] array.


* Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com> wrote:

> @@ -1513,8 +1513,12 @@ static int tg_shares_up
>  	unsigned long weight, rq_weight = 0;
>  	unsigned long shares = 0;
>  	struct sched_domain *sd = data;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	int i;
> 
> +	if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&tg->tg_lock, flags))
> +		return 0;

hm, why trylock?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/