linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] loop file resizable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:12:09 +0100
From:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, tomas@...x.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akinobu.mita@...il.com,
	util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop file resizable

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:26:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well if we're going to do this then I guess we'll need to tell the
> util-linux people about it, as users will be needing some tool with
> which to access the new fucntionality.
> 
> Presumably that would be some enhancement to losetup, or perhaps a new
> tool.  Could the util-linux people please have a think about this and
> comment?

 It shouldn't be a problem to extend the current losetup(8). I have no
 problem with this change.

> Also, I'm not sure that the user interface is terribly good.  The user
> must extend the file size and then we tell the loop driver to use all
> of the new file size.  it would be better (more flexible) to allow
> userspace to explicitly pass in the new size for the loop device.
>
> But I'm not sure that this is worth bothering about.

 I think the interface is useful and kernel side is pretty simple.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/