linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] poll: allow f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:23:01 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	tj@...nel.org
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	hch@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, rminnich@...dia.gov,
	ericvh@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] poll: allow f_op->poll to sleep, take #2

On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
> For both, I was trying to stay consistent with the environment.  I
> find mixed styles in close proximity much uglier than slightly
> different but consistent style.  Eh... Is the consensus checkpatch or
> die?

I think some common sense can be applied in these cases.  For example
a small amount of offending style in close proximity can be fixed as
well, as long as it doesn't interfere too much with the readability of
the patch.

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/