linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] cpu alloc cleanups and implementation improvement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:31:11 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cpu alloc cleanups and implementation improvement

Hi Christoph,

On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:35:05 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> >   I've argued with Christoph that his implementation contains gratuitous
> > obsolescence of perfectly-good APIs; hopefully providing real patches will
> > give us a more useful debate.
> 
> I would not mind if you would take over from here.

So, should I remove the cpu_alloc tree from linux-next?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped