linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: Don't allow priority switch to realtime when the task doesn't belong to init_task_group and when CONFIG_RT_GROUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:51:07 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Don't allow priority switch to realtime when the
 task doesn't belong to init_task_group and when CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED isn't
 set

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 09:24 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> 
>>Peter Zijlstra wrote:

>>>Furthermore your statement shows another misconception, a group of
>>>ungrouped tasks doesn't make sense.
>>
>>Arguably there is such a group, which is "the set of all RT tasks".
> 
> 
> Sure, I understand that, and in fact that's how its implemented, no
> group is still one group (which is how you can bootstrap math from
> group/set theory).
> 
> But its not a manageable group in the cgroup sense, its just the
> collection of RT tasks.

True, but it would be valuable to have statistics for how much cpu time 
the RT tasks are consuming.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/