lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:02:44 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v2

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> impact: new feature sparseirq
> 
>> v2: use pointer array instead of hash
> 
> ok, this looks pretty good!
> 
> A few details:
> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>> +#define set_ioapic_affinity_irq set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc
>> +#else
>> +static void set_ioapic_affinity_irq(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
>> +{
>> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
>> +
>> +	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>> +
>> +	set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(desc, mask);
>> +}
>> +#endif
> 
> i think this distinction can now go away?.

i may miss sth in your previous mail. you said we may put full hash back later, so need keep those change to avoid lookup costs later.

also if we need move_irq_desc between node?

>

 ...

> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>> +	for (new = irq_want; new < NR_IRQS; new++)
>> +#else
>> +	for (new = irq_want; new > 0; new--)
>> +#endif
> 
> this assymetry seems unnecessary too now i think.
> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>> +	irq_want = nr_irqs;
>> +#else
>> +	irq_want = NR_IRQS - 1;
>> +#endif
> 
> ditto. I think we dont want 'nr_irqs' anymore - just remain with 
> NR_IRQS, right?
> 
nr_irqs is the total GSI number when sparseirq is used. so MSI irq will start from that.
...
> 
> Plus in a few more places.
> 
> Please look at _every_ #ifdef or #if in your patch in a .c file and 
> ask the question: can we somehow in some way eliminate it and convert 
> it to some nice inline somewhere or eliminate it via some other trick?

will

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ