linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] ftrace: use code patching for ftrace graph tracer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:04:30 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ftrace: use code patching for ftrace graph tracer

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:52:29 -0800 Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 21:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:16:24 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > 
> > > Impact: more efficient code for ftrace graph tracer
> > > 
> > > This patch uses the dynamic patching, when available, to patch
> > > the function graph code into the kernel.
> > > 
> > > This patch will ease the way for letting both function tracing
> > > and function graph tracing run together.
> > > 
> > > ...
> > >
> > > +static int ftrace_mod_jmp(unsigned long ip,
> > > +			  int old_offset, int new_offset)
> > > +{
> > > +	unsigned char code[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
> > > +
> > > +	if (probe_kernel_read(code, (void *)ip, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE))
> > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +	if (code[0] != 0xe9 || old_offset != *(int *)(&code[1]))
> > 
> > erk.  I suspect that there's a nicer way of doing this amongst our
> > forest of get_unaligned_foo() interfaces.  Harvey will know.
> > 
> 
> if (code[0] != 0xe9 || old_offset != get_unaligned((int *)(&code[1])))

urgh, OK, that didn't really improve anything except to document
something which was already rather obvious.

> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	*(int *)(&code[1]) = new_offset;
> > 
> > Might be able to use put_unaligned_foo() here.
> > 
> 
> 	put_unaligned(new_offset, (int *)(&code[1]));
> 
> > The problem is that these functions use sizeof(*ptr) to work out what
> > to do, so a cast is still needed.  A get_unaligned32(ptr) would be
> > nice.  One which takes a void* and assumes CPU ordering.
> 
> I've been thinking similarly, I could investigate something that
> goes in with the _noalign stuff?

If it's a commonly used pattern (you'd know better than I) then sure,
it would be clean to have

u32 just_gimme_the_u32_at(void *this_address);

> I'll finish the documentation patch for the _noalign stuff and then see
> about doing the host-order bits to fit in as well.
> 
> Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/