linux-kernel - Re: Document sysfs interface to RTC system wakeup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:56:10 -0700
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
	dl9pf@....de, rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: Document sysfs interface to RTC system wakeup

On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:15:24 +0100
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:

> +How to use /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm
> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +This file takes the seconds since epoch to enable a wake event at the
> +specified time.

More documentation is cool.  In this case, though, I'm left with an
immediate question: *why* am I interested in wakealarm?  Reading
through, I eventually figure out that it can maybe be used to get a
system to start up at some point in the future, maybe.  It seems like
that should be said at the outset.

Also; why do I want to migrate from /proc/acpi/alarm?

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/