linux-kernel - Re: Dell Wireless 365 requires reset quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:33:39 +0100
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com>
Subject: Re: Dell Wireless 365 requires reset quirk

Hi Tim,

> >> >From 931ccb629d739aa563347a4e866bc26107e6b545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:18:06 -0700
> >> Subject: [PATCH] Dell Wireless 365 needs BTUSB_RESET quirk.
> >>  OriginalAuthor: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
> >> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c |    3 +++
> >>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> >> index af472e0..051b758 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> >> @@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ static struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {
> >>  	/* Dell laptop with Broadcom chip */
> >>  	{ USB_DEVICE(0x413c, 0x8126), .driver_info = BTUSB_RESET | BTUSB_WRONG_SCO_MTU },
> >>  
> >> +	/* Dell Wireless 365 */
> >> +	{ USB_DEVICE(0x413c, 0x8160), .driver_info = BTUSB_RESET },
> >> +
> >>  	/* Dell Wireless 370 */
> >>  	{ USB_DEVICE(0x413c, 0x8156), .driver_info = BTUSB_RESET | BTUSB_WRONG_SCO_MTU },
> >>  
> > 
> > I shall assume that this patch was authored by Mario.  This should have
> > been communicated by adding his From: line right at the top of the
> > changelog.  Mario's signed-off-by: is absent, but that is tolerable
> > because we have yours.
> > 
> > The (absent) changelog fails to explain what effect this patch has. 
> > _why_ does this driver need this quirk?
> > 
> > As it stands, there is insufficient information here for making
> > 2.6.28-vs-2.6.29 decisions, let alone 2.6.27.x, 2.6.26.x, etc.
> > 
> 
> Is this better (aside from being an attachment) ?

the patch will no longer be needed. I am making HCI Reset the default
and only letting the old drivers quirk a NO_RESET.

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/