linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v10][PATCH 09/13] Restore open file descriprtors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:00:54 -0500
From:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC v10][PATCH 09/13] Restore open file descriprtors



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 15:41 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
>>>>> +   fd = cr_attach_file(file);      /* no need to cleanup 'file' below */
>>>>> +   if (fd < 0) {
>>>>> +           filp_close(file, NULL);
>>>>> +           ret = fd;
>>>>> +           goto out;
>>>>> +   }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +   /* register new <objref, file> tuple in hash table */
>>>>> +   ret = cr_obj_add_ref(ctx, file, parent, CR_OBJ_FILE, 0);
>>>>> +   if (ret < 0)
>>>>> +           goto out;
>>>> Who said that file still exists at that point?
>> Correct. This call should move higher up befor ethe call to cr_attach_file()
> 
> Is that sufficient?  It seems like we're depending on the fd's reference
> to the 'struct file' to keep it valid in the hash.  If something happens
> to the fd (like the other thread messing with it) the 'struct file' can
> still go away.
> 
> Shouldn't we do another get_file() for the hash's reference?

When a shared object is inserted to the hash we automatically take another
reference to it (according to its type) for as long as it remains in the
hash. See:  'cr_obj_ref_grab()' and 'cr_obj_ref_drop()'.  So by moving that
call higher up, we protect the struct file.

Oren.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/