| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:19:55 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: New location for generic headers? > Should we try to get rid of all those silly: > #include <asm-generic/foo.h> > files we have in arch/$ARCH/include/asm? > > We could for example add include/generic/ last in the search path. > Or we could add the files in include/asm and add that last in the > search path. > > Then if we do not find <asm/foo.h> in arch/$ARCH/include/asm/ > then we search include/asm. The only problem I see is that it would user space use of asm/ without make headers_install impossible. I suppose that could break the setup of a lot of people? I think it would cause problems on some of my older boxes at least. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists