| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:16:21 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...e.hu, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, shaohua.li@...el.com Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc6: hpet: object is on stack, but not annotated On Mon 2008-11-24 19:17:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > > > 2008/11/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>: > > > hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0 > > > hpet0: 3 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter > > > ODEBUG: object is on stack, but not annotated > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:251 __debug_object_init+0x2a4/0x352() > > > > Bisected down to 26afe5f2fbf06ea0765aaa316640c4dd472310c0 > > (x86: HPET_MSI Initialise per-cpu HPET timers) > > > > Revert helps > > That's just a warning about a missing annotation. The commit is fine. You must be using very different metric of what "fine" means than rest of the world. (No, introducing WARN_ON()s is not fine; it spams kerneloops.org at least...) Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists