lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:05:59 -0800 (PST) From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> Cc: prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mingo@...e.hu>, <jason.wessel@...driver.com>, <avi@...ranet.com>, <richardj_moore@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 6/9] Use virtual debug registers in process/thread handling code > > Hmm. The 64-bit version of __switch_to does the current change much > > earlier, before __switch_to_xtra and math_state_restore. I wonder if the > > 32-bit version could change to match. I can't see what in __switch_to_xtra > > would care either way, though I may be overlooking something. Ingo? > > Would it be better to move __switch_to_xtra down below the change to > current, rather than moving the change to current up above > __switch_to_xtra? I can't see that anything else in __switch_to_xtra cares either way. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists