linux-kernel - xfs: possible circular locking dependency detected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:20:24 +0800
From:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: xfs: possible circular locking dependency detected

Hi Dave,

I got this warning while accessing xfs on usb storage.
Is this a real problem?

Thanks,
Fengguang

 =======================================================
 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 2.6.28-rc7 #85
 -------------------------------------------------------
 rsync/20106 is trying to acquire lock:
  (iprune_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff811070a4>] shrink_icache_memory+0x84/0x290

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<ffffffffa030fcc5>] xfs_ilock+0x75/0xb0 [xfs]

 which lock already depends on the new lock.


 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}:
        [<ffffffff810799b2>] __lock_acquire+0x12e2/0x18c0
        [<ffffffff8107a029>] lock_acquire+0x99/0xd0
        [<ffffffff8106a937>] down_write_nested+0x57/0x90
        [<ffffffffa030fcf5>] xfs_ilock+0xa5/0xb0 [xfs]
        [<ffffffffa030fea6>] xfs_ireclaim+0x46/0x90 [xfs]
        [<ffffffffa032d8de>] xfs_finish_reclaim+0x5e/0x1a0 [xfs]
        [<ffffffffa032dc3b>] xfs_reclaim+0x11b/0x120 [xfs]
        [<ffffffffa033cd4e>] xfs_fs_clear_inode+0xee/0x120 [xfs]
        [<ffffffff81106e50>] clear_inode+0x90/0x140
        [<ffffffff81106f38>] dispose_list+0x38/0x120
        [<ffffffff81107263>] shrink_icache_memory+0x243/0x290
        [<ffffffff810c3ae5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
        [<ffffffff810c4362>] kswapd+0x542/0x6a0
        [<ffffffff8106610e>] kthread+0x4e/0x90
        [<ffffffff8100dc99>] child_rip+0xa/0x11
        [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

 -> #0 (iprune_mutex){--..}:
        [<ffffffff81079aff>] __lock_acquire+0x142f/0x18c0
        [<ffffffff8107a029>] lock_acquire+0x99/0xd0
        [<ffffffff8148220e>] mutex_lock_nested+0xce/0x320
        [<ffffffff811070a4>] shrink_icache_memory+0x84/0x290
        [<ffffffff810c3ae5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
        [<ffffffff810c4b46>] try_to_free_pages+0x286/0x3f0
        [<ffffffff810bcba5>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x255/0x5b0
        [<ffffffff810e275b>] alloc_pages_current+0x7b/0x100
        [<ffffffff810b5340>] __page_cache_alloc+0x10/0x20
        [<ffffffff810bf0e8>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x138/0x250
        [<ffffffff810bf2df>] ondemand_readahead+0xdf/0x3c0
        [<ffffffff810bf669>] page_cache_async_readahead+0xa9/0xc0
        [<ffffffff810b5e39>] do_generic_file_read+0x259/0x4d0
        [<ffffffff810b6ff0>] generic_file_aio_read+0xd0/0x1c0
        [<ffffffffa033c5ea>] xfs_read+0x12a/0x280 [xfs]
        [<ffffffffa0337c46>] xfs_file_aio_read+0x56/0x60 [xfs]
        [<ffffffff810f1459>] do_sync_read+0xf9/0x140
        [<ffffffff810f20c8>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x180
        [<ffffffff810f2285>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
        [<ffffffff8100c62a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
        [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

 other info that might help us debug this:

 2 locks held by rsync/20106:
  #0:  (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<ffffffffa030fcc5>] xfs_ilock+0x75/0xb0 [xfs]
  #1:  (shrinker_rwsem){----}, at: [<ffffffff810c39f7>] shrink_slab+0x37/0x180

 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 20106, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.28-rc7 #85
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81078298>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xd8/0xe0
  [<ffffffff81079aff>] __lock_acquire+0x142f/0x18c0
  [<ffffffff810c0576>] ? __pagevec_release+0x26/0x40
  [<ffffffff8107a029>] lock_acquire+0x99/0xd0
  [<ffffffff811070a4>] ? shrink_icache_memory+0x84/0x290
  [<ffffffff8148220e>] mutex_lock_nested+0xce/0x320
  [<ffffffff811070a4>] ? shrink_icache_memory+0x84/0x290
  [<ffffffff811070a4>] ? shrink_icache_memory+0x84/0x290
  [<ffffffff811070a4>] shrink_icache_memory+0x84/0x290
  [<ffffffff810c3ae5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
  [<ffffffff810c4b46>] try_to_free_pages+0x286/0x3f0
  [<ffffffff810c1640>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x260
  [<ffffffff810bcba5>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x255/0x5b0
  [<ffffffff810e275b>] alloc_pages_current+0x7b/0x100
  [<ffffffff810b5340>] __page_cache_alloc+0x10/0x20
  [<ffffffff810bf0e8>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x138/0x250
  [<ffffffff810bf07a>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0xca/0x250
  [<ffffffff810bf2df>] ondemand_readahead+0xdf/0x3c0
  [<ffffffff81013e49>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
  [<ffffffff810bf669>] page_cache_async_readahead+0xa9/0xc0
  [<ffffffff810b5e39>] do_generic_file_read+0x259/0x4d0
  [<ffffffff810b47a0>] ? file_read_actor+0x0/0x190
  [<ffffffff810b6ff0>] generic_file_aio_read+0xd0/0x1c0
  [<ffffffffa030fcc5>] ? xfs_ilock+0x75/0xb0 [xfs]
  [<ffffffffa033c5ea>] xfs_read+0x12a/0x280 [xfs]
  [<ffffffffa0337c46>] xfs_file_aio_read+0x56/0x60 [xfs]
  [<ffffffff810f1459>] do_sync_read+0xf9/0x140
  [<ffffffff81066560>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
  [<ffffffff811ecdaf>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x7f/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81483f9d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
  [<ffffffff810f20c8>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x180
  [<ffffffff810f2285>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
  [<ffffffff8100c62a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/