linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] CGroups: Add a per-subsystem hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:05:14 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	menage@...gle.com
CC:	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] CGroups: Add a per-subsystem hierarchy_mutex

> +static void cgroup_lock_hierarchy(struct cgroupfs_root *root)
> +{
> +	/* We need to take each hierarchy_mutex in a consistent order */

This comment is not so clear. Do you mean for_each_subsys() can't be
used here?

But this function is used in cgroup.c internally, and always called
with cgroup_lock held, so it's OK to use for_each_subsys().

> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT; i++) {
> +		struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i];
> +		if (ss->root == root)
> +			mutex_lock_nested(&ss->hierarchy_mutex, i);
> +	}
> +}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/