[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:31:06 +0100
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>
To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>
CC: reinette chatre
<public-reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@...h.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...lic.gmane.org"
<public-linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...h.gmane.org>,
"linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...lic.gmane.org"
<public-linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...h.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: iwlagn interrupt problem
Alexander E. Patrakov napsal(a):
> 2008/12/12 Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>:
>> I assume that this backtrace I've got with 2.6.28-rc7 is the same issue ?
>
> No, this is different. My issue is with unacceptable latency when
> bringing the interface down. In your dmesg, the interface was never
> brought up or down.
>
Hmm - it was something like an hour after resume when the problem started,
Here is timed part of the same backtrace:
[65627.782972] wlan0: associate with AP 00:11:d8:da:65:40
[65627.785569] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:11:d8:da:65:40 (capab=0x401
status=0 aid=8)
[65627.785576] wlan0: associated
[69541.209873] wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:11:d8:da:65:40 - assume
out of range
[69541.810104] iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms.
[69542.309861] iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_RXON_ASSOC: time out after 500ms.
The begging of my trace looked similar.
Should I open new bugzilla separately ?
Zdenek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists