linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: fix assign_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:06:23 -0800
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: fix assign_irq_vector boot up problem

Mike Travis wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
>> So to do this cleanly, i merged those bits into cpus4096 and the 
>> x86/reboot bits as well - now the plan would be for Mike to send a 
>> (rebased) series against that base. I tried a plain merge and the 
...
> And I've no clue how to cause a git tree to rebase.  What I can do is extract
...

Well I have a clue now (hmm, git-rebase, who would have thunk. ;-)

I'll rebase the for-ingo tree, but I'm still confused about those
files that are in linux-next/rr since they are entering upstream
via linux-next.  Won't any changes I make be dropped when you
push the cpus4096 branch upstream?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/