[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:27:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: no softirq pending warnings for offline cpus
* Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>
> After a cpu was taken down during cpu hotplug (read: disabled for interrupts)
> it still might have pending softirqs. However take_cpu_down makes sure
> that the idle task will run next instead of ksoftirqd on the taken down cpu.
> The idle task will call tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick which might warn about
> pending softirqs just before the cpu kills itself completely.
> However the pending softirqs on the dead cpu aren't a problem because they
> will be moved to an online cpu during CPU_DEAD handling.
>
> So make sure we warn only for online cpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
applied to tip/timers/nohz, thanks Heiko!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists