lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:11:17 -0800 From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPIO: Fix probe() error return in gpio driver probes On Sunday 14 December 2008, Ben Dooks wrote: > Has anyone reveiwed this patch? Are there any comments, or can this > be commited at somepoint (even if it is during the next merge window)? I was thinking that -EINVAL is almost the least informative diagnostic code possible, since so many places return it that it's usually hard to find out *which* invalid parameter triggered ... Is there a less-overloaded code you could return? I have no issue with the patch other than that. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists