linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/13 v7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:07:23 +0800
From:	"Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Jike Song <albcamus@...il.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"achiang@...com" <achiang@...com>,
	"bjorn.helgaas@...com" <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	"grundler@...isc-linux.org" <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>,
	"randy.dunlap@...cle.com" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	"rdreier@...co.com" <rdreier@...co.com>,
	"horms@...ge.net.au" <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13 v7] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support

Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:37:54AM +0800, Jike Song wrote:
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>> Given a respin of 10-13 I think it's reasonable to merge this into 2.6.29, but 
>>> I'd be much happier about it if we got some driver code along with it, so as 
>>> not to have an unused interface sitting around for who knows how many 
>>> releases.  Is that reasonable?  Do you know if any of the corresponding PF/VF 
>>> driver bits are ready yet?
>> Hi Jesse, 
>>
>> Yu Zhao has posted a patch set with subject "SR-IOV driver example" 
>> at November 26, which illustrated the usage of SR-IOV API in Intel 82576 VF/PF
>> drivers;-)
> 
> Yes, but that driver was soundly rejected by the network driver
> maintainers, so I wouldn't go around showing that as your primary
> example of how to use this interface :)
> 
> The point is valid, I don't think these apis should go into the tree
> without a driver or some other code using them.  Otherwise they make no
> sense at all to have in-tree.

I agree the point is valid, but on another hand this is a 'the chicken & 
the egg' problem -- if we don't have the SR-IOV base, people who are 
developing PF drivers can not get their changes in-tree. Maybe they are 
holding the patches and waiting on the infrastructure... :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/