linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/15] sanitize AUDIT_MQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:40:15 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/15] sanitize AUDIT_MQ_SENDRECV

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:40:54PM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * logging the original value of *msg_prio in mq_timedreceive(2)
> >   is insane - the argument is write-only (i.e. syscall always
> >   ignores the original value and only overwrites it).
> 
> I wonder if any existing certifications need to be amended.

I rather doubt it, but I really don't know the bureaucracy of that.
Just to clarify:
	Old code logs the value of *msg_prio; that value is always
ignored by syscall (it may store something there, but that's it -
pure output parameter)
	New code does not change the format of log message; the value
in that field of the message is replaced with 0.  That's the only
difference.

Whether that requires amending of the existing certs... bugger if I know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/