linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] musb: fix DaVinci build again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:52:15 -0800
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	me@...ipebalbi.com
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>, gregkh@...e.de,
	felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
	davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] musb: fix DaVinci build again

On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >  #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> 
> you're including <linux/gpio.h> twice.

Yeah, I suppose I just edited the patch to
delete segments that *did* get merged.  It
looks like that change to <linux/gpio.h> got
included, and "patch" didn't complain ...
leaving the puzzle of just why the *rest* of
that pre-2.6.27 build fix still hasn't merged.

A double inclusion is a minor-but-harmless
annoyance.  Those <asm/arch/...> ==> <mach/...>
header changes were mostly merged by 2.6.27-rc2,
but ones for this particular file got stripped
out.  More than a small bit puzzling; I can
understand patches getting dropped or lost,
but not getting mangled like that.

When I verify that I have a kernel booting
on the DM6446 EVM in mainline, I'll resend
both of the patches.  They are IMO overdue
to merge.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/