lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:15:29 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 byteorder.h: use __asm__/__inline__ for userspace

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 01:50:04AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> Use __asm__/__inline__ rather than asm/inline for all the functions
>>> exported to userspace.
>> I will imagine that we will see cleanup patches converting
>> these back to inline/asm.
>> How about doing this conversion as part of the headers_install.pl
>> script so we know it is always correct?
>>
>> Then we can keep the familiar inline/asm in the kernel headers
>> and always use the correct __asm__, __inline__ version for our
>> exported headers.
> 
> or name it __asm__exported__ to make sure it isnt cleaned up away.
> 

Seems better to do it automatically.  We end up with cleaner-looking
code that way, too.

It doesn't solve the need for symbols in inline functions in exported
headers to have __ prefixes, though.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ