| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:08:55 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> Cc: x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: reboot.c declare port_cf9_safe before they get used * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org> wrote: > Hello Ingo, > > On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 11:31 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > btw., this is ugly now: > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c > > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > > > #endif > > > > > > #include <mach_ipi.h> > > > +#include "../pci/pci.h" > > > > could you send another patch that moves arch/x86/pci/pci.h to > > arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h (and update all the pci.h include sites)? > > > > 1. I send [PATCH] move arch/x86/pci/pci.h to > arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h but I forget to write x86: before this > patch. no, your patch is fine. I routinely fix up commit logs. Jesse, is it fine to you if we push this via the x86 tree? A couple of usage sites of arch/x86/pci/pci.h arose that use ../pci/pci.h kind of ugly #include prefixes, which justifies moving the file to arch/x86/include/asm. No change in behavior. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists