lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:00:19 -0500
From:	"Matt Cross" <matt.cross@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28?

I think the work to move ebtables to use xtables broke ebtables.
Specifically, in commit 8cc784eec6676b58e7f60419c88179aaa97bf71c the
return value of the match functions was inverted so that they return 1
(true) on matches instead of EBT_MATCH (0), and vice versa (look in
ebt_ip.c).  The logic in ebtables.c (ebt_do_table() and
EBT_MATCH_ITERATE()) expect match functions to return 0 for matches.

The patch at the end of this message fixes the problem, but seems a
little hacky to me.  Who's the right person to address this?

    -Matt


--- linux-2.6.28.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c   2008-12-24
18:26:37.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.28/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c        2008-12-31
16:17:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
 {
        par->match     = m->u.match;
        par->matchinfo = m->data;
-       return m->u.match->match(skb, par);
+       return !m->u.match->match(skb, par);
 }

 static inline int ebt_dev_check(char *entry, const struct net_device *device)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ