| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:19:27 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:11:53 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > or we declare the irq probing stuff "rare" and just make THAT fully > > serializing.... > > do a full synchronization before starting a probe > > Yes. That's entirely possible. However, have you verified that if an > async thread does a synchronization, it doesn't deadlock? an async thread can synchronize on its own cookie. so yes if we make this a global serialize, we can't do irq autoprobing in async context. If we can use PNP/etc for serial.. I don't think that's a big deal.. nobody with sane hw would need to autoprobe ever. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists