linux-kernel - Re: document ext3 requirements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:58:27 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	"Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
	rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: document ext3 requirements

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:37:56PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Are you sure you need to have thrashing? AFAICT metadata + fsync heavy
> workload should be enough... and there were scripts to easily repeat
> that.

The memory pressure is needed to force disk buffers out to disk sooner
than fsync() would normally force buffers out.  The scripts which I've
seen induced memory pressure.  If the disk is *super* aggressive at
reordering writes, I suppose a heavy fsync workload might be enough on
its own, but in practice, it's generally not enough.

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/