linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/10] PCI PM: Rearrange code in pci-driver.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:25:01 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/10] PCI PM: Rearrange code in pci-driver.c

Hi!

> Rename two functions and rearrange code in drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> so that it's easier to follow.  In particular, separate invocations
> of the legacy callbacks from the rest of the new callbacks' code.
> 
> No functional changes should result from this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |  104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>

> @@ -504,17 +504,21 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device 
>  	struct device_driver *drv = dev->driver;
>  	int error = 0;
>  
> +	if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev)) {
> +		error = pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> +		goto Exit;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (drv && drv->pm) {
>  		if (drv->pm->suspend) {
>  			error = drv->pm->suspend(dev);
>  			suspend_report_result(drv->pm->suspend, error);
>  		}
> -	} else if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev)) {
> -		error = pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
>  	} else {
>  		pci_pm_default_suspend(pci_dev);
>  	}
>

Does this mean that pci_has_legacy_pm_support() => !(drv && drv->pm) ?
Should pci_has_legacy_pm_support() check for that and WARN() in case
both sets of callbacks are set?
									Pavel


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/