linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6][v5] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:24:07 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, bastian@...di.eu.org, daniel@...ac.com,
	xemul@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6][v5] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals

On 12/30, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> I'd just make the flag a parameter to send_signal() directly.
> Then you can just change kill_pid_info_as_uid (or its replacement)
> to call send_signal() with that new flag (and the 'group' flag)
> directly instead of using the trivial __group_send_sig_info wrapper.

Ah, good. Can't understand why I didn't think about this before!

But, perhaps, it is better to add the new helper, __send_signal()
or whatever which has the new "from_ancestor_ns" argument. Then,

	static int send_signal(...)
	{
		bool from_ancestor_ns = 0;

	#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
		if (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info)) {
			from_ancestor_ns = !task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t));
		}
	#endif

		return __send_signal(..., from_ancestor_ns);
	}

but this is cosmetic issue.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/