linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix NFSD regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:56:11 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, hch@....de, jmorris@...ei.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix NFSD regression

J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> OK, I've tested this and applied it for 2.6.29.
> 
> Though it only actually fixes the regression if your other patch ("CRED:
> Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys_faccessat() [ver #2")
> is also applied.  I'd like to send in my pull request today, but I
> usually try not to send a pull request whose tip doesn't pass at least
> my basic regression tests....  And that other patch is outside my
> baliwick.    Can someone else handle it?

Well, if you're willing to supply an Acked-by or Tested-by for one or both
patches I can pass them on to James or Linus.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/