| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:19:58 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Warren Turkal <wt@...guintechs.org>, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, Diego Elio 'Flameeyes' Petten? <flameeyes@...il.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:17:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I'm pretty sure we already had a version better than that in your > > tree on the list. But I've lost track and we should just restart > > the review cycle on -fsdevel. > > Yeah, I have the three hfs patches: > > hfsplus-identify-journal-info-block-in-volume-header.patch > hfsplus-fix-journal-detection.patch > hfs-add-basic-export-support.patch > > in a holding pattern awaiting a second round, due to laggy, incomplete > and confusing noises from various people. It all needs a revisit. The first two are not for me to decide. They look fine code-wise, but IIRC Roman had some issues with wether the condition should be possible at all. The third one is where I requested a respin, and I'm pretty sure I've seen a version with some improvement over the one in your tree. Let's get the latests version back on -fsdevel and review it again. The one in your tree certainly is not ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists