linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:24:39 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@...s.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:13:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc added)
> 
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:57:44 -0500
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:43:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > softirq-introduce-statistics-for-softirq.patch
> > > proc-export-statistics-for-softirq-to-proc.patch
> > > proc-update-document-for-proc-softirqs-and-proc-stat.patch
> > 
> > Why is this in procfs?
> 
> softirq stuff in /proc seems appropriate?  It's alongside
> /proc/interrupts.  We could put it in /trendy-fs-of-the-day, but what
> would it gain us?

debugfs seems to be the normal thing for these.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/