lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:56:46 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] IA64: unifying ways to handle multiple sets of dma mapping ops

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:36:05PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This patchset is the first part of the unification of ways to handle
> multiple sets of dma mapping API. The whole work consists of three
> patchset. This is for IA64 and can be applied independently.
> 
> dma_mapping_ops (or dma_ops) struct is used to handle multiple sets of
> dma mapping API by X86, SPARC, and POWER. IA64 also handle multiple
> sets of dma mapping API but in a very different way (some define
> magic).
> 
> X86 and IA64 share VT-d and SWIOTLB code. We need several workarounds
> for it because of the deference of ways to handle multiple sets of dma
> mapping API (e.g., X86 people can't freely change struct
> dma_mapping_ops in x86's dma-mapping.h now because it could break
> IA64).  Seems POWER will use SWIOTLB code soon. I think that it's time
> to unify ways to handle multiple sets of dma mapping API. After
> applying the whole work, we have struct dma_map_ops
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h (I also dream of changing all the archs to
> use SWIOTLB in order to remove the bounce code in the block and
> network stacks...).
> 
> This patchset changes IA64 to handle multiple sets of dma mapping API
> in the common way (as X86, SPARC, and POWER do):

Do you have any plans to update sparc too?
Maybe it is not relevant.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ