linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri,  9 Jan 2009 20:25:27 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29

> I discussed this with Phillip a bit, and it looks like we'll go for a
> 2.6.21 merge.  This gives a couple of months for testing and review in
> linux-next.
> 
> Of course, this assumes that someone will actually perform that testing
> and review.  Chances are that it'll just sit there, getting nothing more
> than compilation testing.

As far as I heared from japanese embedded developer, squashfs is already used by
embedded community and some consumer electronics product.
Therefore, I think it can merge now if it's no impact to other subsystem.


> Apparently I reviewed the code a while back - that grey cell must have
> died.  Does anyone else intend to review the code in that timeframe? 
> If not, we might as well merge it now, if ever..


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/