| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:53:21 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: Partially defer some of the async stuff to the next release On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:42:34 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > I think it's better that we defer some of the asynchronous boot > > stuff to 2.6.30 so that it can bake in -next for a bit. I would > > like to keep the core infrastructure in place for 29, so that the > > various subsystem patches etc can just use it in -next without > > generating dependencies in the patch flow. > > > > for both libata and the inode delete very simple things can be done > > to fix them, but I would feel a lot more comfortable giving these a > > ride in -next. > > Can we rather make this something that people can enable with a > "fastboot" option and is disabled by default? At least that way the > ATA people can see the problem, and don't just forget about it, since > we want it fixed. ok sure, that's not hard. I'll get that going, hopefully before the end of the day -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists