linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:01:59 +0000
From:	Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>,
	kernel@...uxace.com, kay.sievers@...y.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	jeff@...zik.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
	hpa@...or.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
>>> Of course, this assumes that someone will actually perform that testing
>>> and review.  Chances are that it'll just sit there, getting nothing more
>>> than compilation testing.
>> Almost every distribution ships the updated version and has done for ages
>> - exactly what kind of testing is going to beat that ?
> 
> Yes, if this is really in use by everybody, then not merging it is kind of 
> pointless. 
> 
> 		Linus
> 

Great news...  Thanks everyone for reviewing Squashfs and helping
to get it merged.

Phillip

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/