lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:46:28 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeremy@...p.org, jj@...osbits.net,
	weiyi.huang@...il.com, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:32:51 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:04:28 +0100
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:55:27 +0100
> > > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > * Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 18:10 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Patch is against Jeremy's Xen patch queue which is based on a pre-Xmas
> > > > > > > tip tree so fairly out of date, I hope it is somewhat useful though.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Here's a version again tip-latest, only compile tested though since my
> > > > > > testing relies on the Xen dom0 patch queue.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Applied them to tip/core/iommu:
> > > > > 
> > > > >  961d7d0: swiotlb: do not use sg_virt()
> > > > >  0b8698a: swiotlb: range_needs_mapping should take a physical address.
> > > > 
> > > > I think that Xen camp wants these changes for 2.6.29. Are you trying to 
> > > > push tip/core/iommu for 2.6.29?
> > > 
> > > Yet unclear, depends on testing. Will probably wait for 2.6.30 though.
> > 
> > Thanks, I see. Probably, it will get tons of conflict due to the dma API 
> > unification touching everywhere.
> >
> > BTW, what happened to?
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123125853906986&w=2
> 
> it's in -rc1.

Duh, sorry about that. I missed it somehow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ