linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: convert rcupreempt trace to seq file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:16:04 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: convert rcupreempt trace to seq file

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 06:01:31AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:39:40AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 03:48:46PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > > > Impact: also fix a bug in show_rcustats()
> > > > 
> > > > Use seq file for simplification, and the global buffer and mutex can be
> > > > removed.
> > > 
> > > Looks very good, and passes my tests.
> > > 
> > > > While doing this, I found rcustats will never show 'ggp' and 'rcc' fields
> > > > due to a bug in show_rcustats().
> > > 
> > > Good eyes!
> > > 
> > > The only change I ask is that you pull the contents of
> > > rcupreempt_debugfs_init() into the now-one-line rcupreempt_trace_init().
> > > 
> > > With that change:
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >  kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c |  155 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 
> > i think the whole kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c file might be a good candidate 
> > for the 'statistical tracing' extensions to ftrace that Frederice is 
> > working on.
> > 
> > That way there would just be a few tracepoints, and the rest would be done 
> > in kernel/tracing/trace_rcupreempt.c, or so.
> > 	Ingo
> 
> Indeed!
> 
> The debugfs and seqfile handling and handled in the statistical
> tracing engine.
> 
> You just have to provide an iterator for your stat entries through two callbacks:
> 
> _ stat_start() -> gives the first entry
> _ stat_next() -> iterates over the next entry
> 
> And an output callback
> 
> _ stat_show() -> print one entry from your stat list
> 
> And two optional things:
> 
> _ stat_cmp() -> compare two entries, useful if you want your stats to be sorted
> _ stat_headers() -> provide the first line in your stat file, typically to describe your columns
> 
> The last thing you need is to give a name to your trace file.
> You will retrieve it into /debugfs/tracing/trace_stat/your_file_name as a current snapshot
> of your stats.
> 
> It is currently used by the branch tracer, and by a pending patch for a new workqueue
> tracer which will provide you a simple example.
> 
> If you have any question about how to use it, don't hesitate to ask.

Li Zefan, is this something you would be willing to try?  Sounds like
it might be a good addition.

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/