linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: headers - include linux/types.h instead of asm/types.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:49:56 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: headers - include linux/types.h instead of
	asm/types.h

[Ingo Molnar - Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 03:45:05PM +0100]
...
| > 
| > Until such a file not passed to some *.S. For example for e820.h we have 
| > it included to arch/x86/boot/header.S but fortunately we're bound by 
| > __ASSEMBLY__. So there linux/types.h shouldn't hurt. Will check others 
| > and report then.
| 
| Any reason to not protect types.h with #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ ?
| 
| 	Ingo
| 

hmm... good question :) letme check

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/