linux-kernel - netlabel: UNLABELED ath9k not denying unlabeled traffic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:18:18 -0800
From:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: netlabel: UNLABELED ath9k not denying unlabeled traffic

When using netlabelctl on a dell laptop
I'm able to define the addresses that I want:

netlabelctl unlbl add interface:wlan0 address:<radiostation> 
label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
netlabelctl unlbl add interface:wlan0 address:<myaddress> 
label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
netlabelctl  -p unlbl accept off

{the above was from http://paulmoore.livejournal.com/1758.html };
(I'm able to listen to the radio station allowed, then if I choose 
another station; if I haven't defined an address like the above, mplayer 
just sits there.denying the unlabeled packet. that is until I allow the 
address);

The problem I have is when I do the same on my macbook pro ati chipset.
with the ath9k module, I'm able to listen to any station, search the web 
etc..
it seems netlabelctl  -p unlbl accept off makes no difference if it's on 
or off.

Is this built into ath9k yet, or is there something I'm missing?

regards;

Justin P. Mattock

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/