linux-kernel - Re: linux kernel without file system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:57:09 +0200
From:	Rogan Dawes <lists@...es.za.net>
To:	Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be>
Cc:	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>,
	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux kernel without file system

Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Rogan Dawes wrote:
>> Philippe De Muyter wrote:
>>
>>> Keeping thinking about it, I now think that my 'application program'
>>> (basically a serial-to-ethernet converter) should be a kernel thread,
>>> because of the small memory constraints.
>>>
>>> The question is thus how to access the serial lines from a kernel thread.
>>>
>>> Philippe
>> If your constraints are that severe, perhaps you should be investigating
>> other solutions. e.g. eCos?
> 
> I like to reuse (and contribute to) the linux drivers and kernel.
> 
>> Linux doesn't ALWAYS have to be the answer :-)
> 
> No ? :)
> 
> Philippe
> 

Ok, in that case, perhaps you should explain exactly what your
constraints are (target board, max memory/flash, etc), and maybe folks
will be able to provide more sensible answers.

Good luck!

Rogan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/