linux-kernel - Re: Buffer allocation for USB transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:31:19 +0100
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	"Christian Eggers" <ceggers@....de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Buffer allocation for USB transfers

Am Wednesday 14 January 2009 19:58:44 schrieb Christian Eggers:
> For some reason the second example (kmalloc()) doesn't seem to cause problems (on 
> my platform) but is there are guarantee that kmalloc() 
> without GFP_DMA does always return a DMA capable buffer?

We depend on memory returned for GFP_KERNEL capable of DMA on PCI.
GFP_DMA is for ISA dma.

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/