linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] Btrfs: use BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX for struct btrfs_ioctl_vol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:12:24 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>
Cc:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Btrfs: use BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX for struct
	btrfs_ioctl_vol_args

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:03:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>> 
>> I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and
>> it also looks that this one is more proper.
>> 
>> Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it.
>> 
>
>Nope, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX is specifically used for the ioctl stuff, makes the
>arguments 4k aligned, this patch is incorrect.  Thanks,

Ok, then what is BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX? :)


-- 
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/