lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:56:59 -0500
From:	Paul Clements <paul.clements@...eleye.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
CC:	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: nbd: add locking to nbd_ioctl

Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Fri 2009-01-16 10:24:06, Paul Clements wrote:

>> lo->sock is only modified under tx_lock (except for SET_SOCK, where the 
>> device is being initialized, in which case it's impossible for any other 
>> thread to be accessing the device)
> 
> Well, unless the user is evil or confused? :-).

Even in that case, you're just going to get EBUSY. Nothing bad will 
happen. SET_SOCK checks for lo->file, so it cannot be called on an 
active nbd device.


>> As for other fields, I assume you're talking about blksize, et al. 
>> Taking tx_lock doesn't prevent you from screwing yourself if you modify 
>> those while the device is active. You'd need to disallow those ioctls 
>> when the device is active (check lo->file). Again, this is only going to 
>> happen if you really misuse the ioctls.
> 
> Ok, I'll take a look at the missing checks. I'd really like to make
> this "stable" -- no amount of misuse should crash the kernel.

Just to summarize, I don't think we need to hold tx_lock around the 
entirety of nbd_ioctl. We do need one extra tx_lock around xmit_timeout 
and we do need to check for lo->file and return EBUSY in all of the 
SET_*SIZE* ioctls.

Thanks,
Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ